Say goodbye to blind spots, guesswork, and swivel-chair monitoring. With Splunk Observability Cloud and AI Assistant, correlate all your metrics, logs, and traces automatically and in one place.
Observability isn’t about collecting more telemetry — it’s about making that telemetry data meaningful.
Contextual observability transforms raw telemetry into actionable insights by enriching it with consistent tagging and metadata. Without context, telemetry data remains fragmented, troubleshooting slows, and aligning with business priorities is nearly impossible.
In this guide, I’ll explain:
If you’re responsible for or contribute to improving observability outcomes, this article is for you — platform, SRE and DevOps engineers and leaders, Observability CoE stakeholders, product owners, and more.
Contextual observability means enriching telemetry data — metrics, logs, traces, alerts, synthetic test results, etc. — with consistent metadata that ideally adds both business and technical meaning.
This is not tagging for tagging’s sake. By adding context via tags and metadata, you turn telemetry into usable signals that answers critical questions like:
Consider this example:
With this level of context in place, telemetry becomes immediately more actionable. Teams can filter by business unit or tier, route alerts to the right people, and confidently diagnose problems across distributed architectures.
Instead of “what is this metric?”, the question becomes “what’s broken in production right now, and who needs to act?”
That’s the power of contextual observability!
Context should be added as early in the telemetry lifecycle as possible, ideally at the source, whether that’s through an OpenTelemetry SDK, agent config, or cloud-native exporter. Early enrichment ensures that the context flows downstream into dashboards, alerts, and queries without requiring patchwork fixes or one-off dashboards.
Telemetry Type | Business Context Examples | Technical Context Examples |
---|---|---|
Metrics | Environment, application, tier, service owner | Region, instance type, OS, cluster name |
Events | Affected business service, owner, priority level | Hostname, tool/agent source, event type |
Logs | Application, deployment stage, support group | Container ID, node name, log source |
Traces | Service name, customer segment, release version | Kubernetes namespace, span type, runtime (JVM, Python) |
Synthetic Tests | Application, test type, owner, tier | Location, browser version, network type |
Dashboards | Business unit, tier, criticality level | Data source, cluster, technology stack |
(Related reading: metadata management.)
In legacy environments, monitoring relied on static infrastructure. Hostnames meant something. Applications ran on long-lived VMs. Change was infrequent and predictable.
Today, of course, that’s no longer the case. The volume of telemetry data is skyrocketing. Between cloud infrastructure, containerized workloads, serverless functions, synthetic tests, and distributed tracing, organizations are generating more observability data than ever.
At the same time, the environments this data represents are increasingly ephemeral. Services are deployed multiple times a day, hosts come and go, Kubernetes pods live for minutes, and infrastructure scales dynamically.
In this kind of environment, raw telemetry — that is, telemetry without context — quickly loses value. Identifiers like hostnames, IPs, or auto-generated resource names are not enough to understand what’s happening, let alone understand why it matters or who should respond.
Without consistent context, however, observability becomes fragmented and harder to use. Detection slows, diagnosis drifts, and action stalls. Symptoms of missing context include:
Engineers face alert fatigue, compliance is significantly more challenging, and you’ve lost pretty much all your ability to tie telemetry to business outcomes. The result?
Organizations collect vast amounts of data but miss the value that data can deliver.
Contextual observability solves this by enriching telemetry with self-describing, filterable metadata. This structure helps systems scale and IT resources understand what they’re seeing.
When implemented consistently, contextualized observability enables:
In a world defined by constant change, context is what turns observability into something actionable, reliable, and valuable.
Adding context to your observability practice does not have to be difficult. Follow these five best practices to establish and scale contextual observability.
Tags provide the structure that gives meaning to your telemetry data, but their value depends on consistency across the organization.
Without a global tagging standard, teams risk adopting inconsistent approaches, leading to broken filters, unscalable alert logic, and unreliable dashboards. (Even small inconsistencies, like env=Prod vs. env=prod can break dashboards and duplicate alert rules.)
To ensure consistency, your tagging standard should define:
Tags such as IDs or frequently changing attributes can strain performance, inflate costs, and degrade usability in platforms not designed for high-cardinality data. Use these tags intentionally and make sure your observability tooling, like Splunk Observability Cloud, can handle these tags at scale.
A strong tagging standard should also include:
By establishing and enforcing a robust tagging standard, you ensure your observability data remains reliable, actionable, and scalable.
Before implementing your tagging strategy, it’s important to ground it in well-established best practices. Cloud providers — AWS, Azure, and GCP — and infrastructure components like Kubernetes and VMware have all established tagging best practices to support scale, automation, and governance.
These principles are adapted from AWS’s tagging best practices. While these examples are from AWS, the concepts apply broadly to modern IT workloads:
The goal isn’t a perfect taxonomy. It’s a usable, scalable standard that supports consistency across teams and systems.
Observability teams may not own the global tagging standard, but they should influence it. Many critical observability use cases — such as alert routing, SLO reporting, and dashboard filtering — depend on tags that aren’t always prioritized in infrastructure tagging discussions.
Many of the most valuable tags for observability already exist across infrastructure and cloud standards:
These tags help drive alert routing, dashboard filtering, priority mapping, and business alignment, and should be directly referenced in how observability assets are designed and deployed.
In a past life, we implemented a standardized maintenance_window tag across critical systems. This tag used clear, consistent values like "3thur2000" (indicating the 3rd Thursday at 8pm) to define scheduled maintenance windows for a given resource.
The observability team used this tag to suppress alerts during scheduled maintenance, reducing noise and increasing confidence in alerts. This simple yet effective approach demonstrates how a single, well-applied tag can streamline operations and enhance the observability experience.
Once your tagging standard is defined, the next step is to operationalize it across your architecture.
That means implementing a multilayered metadata strategy that spans all layers of your stack, from infrastructure to services, and from source to visualization. This approach ensures that context is captured early and preserved throughout your observability pipeline.
In a modern environment, metadata can (and should) be applied at multiple points:
This multilayered approach ensures context is preserved from source to value realization (dashboards/visualizations, detectors, etc). When properly implemented it enables consistent filtering, ownership attribution, and signal correlation, regardless of where telemetry originates.
Once you’ve implemented consistent tagging and enrichment across your environment, the real payoff comes when you start using that context to drive the observability experience.
A strong metadata strategy enables dashboards, detectors, and workflows to become reusable, scalable, and actionable. These aren’t one-off configurations — they’re dynamic assets that adapt to the environment, team, or workload through metadata.
Asset | Contextual Use Case Example |
---|---|
Dashboards | Use top-level filters like environment, application, or tier to isolate views. A single template can serve hundreds of services without duplication. |
Detectors/Alerts | Scope to fire only on environment=prod and tier=0, reducing noise. Include support_group to route incidents automatically. |
Synthetic Tests | Tag by application, environment, region, or team to group failures, isolate impact, and prioritize response based on service tier. |
Incident Routing | Use metadata like support_group or app_tier to auto-assign incidents to the correct on-call team. |
Runbook Links | Dynamically insert service-specific documentation in alerts using metadata like service.name or failure_type. |
This approach transforms observability from static dashboards and hardcoded alert rules into metadata-driven workflows that scale with your organization, driving self-service observability. It’s how you go from ad hoc visibility to operational consistency, without introducing friction.
Sending more telemetry isn’t enough. To realize the full value of your observability investments, that data needs context.
Context makes telemetry meaningful. It connects signals to systems, ownership, and business impact, driving faster response, smarter alerts, and more actionable insights. It turns a bunch of telemetry data into valuable observability outcomes.
If you’re working to mature your observability practice, context is where the value starts to show. Interested in learning more?
The future of observability isn't more data — it’s better, smarter, contextualized data. And it's ready for you to build it.
The world’s leading organizations rely on Splunk, a Cisco company, to continuously strengthen digital resilience with our unified security and observability platform, powered by industry-leading AI.
Our customers trust Splunk’s award-winning security and observability solutions to secure and improve the reliability of their complex digital environments, at any scale.