false

Perspectives Home / CTO STACK

Turning Tool Consolidation Strategy into Lasting Impact

Consolidating tools saves you money but execution, governance, and relentless focus will decide whether the gains stick or slip away.

Managing tools isn’t just a technical task. It’s a leadership challenge that plays out across strategy meetings, budgets, and everyday operations. Over time, even the most careful teams end up with more software than they really need. Tool sprawl creeps in and quietly slows everything down — innovation, agility, even day-to-day work.


I’ve talked before about why consolidation has to be driven by leadership, not just IT. Hopefully, you’ve uncovered the value tool consolidation can bring through building your case, mapped the overlap, and scored the tools. That’s a big step.


Now it’s about making the hard calls. Cutting redundant tools is part of it, sure. But the real work is choosing the right ones to carry you forward; the ones that fit your long-term goals and give your teams room to grow with whatever’s coming next. So, the final phase in our tool consolidation journey focuses on turning your proven strategy into action.

 

per-newsletter-promo-v3-380x253

Resilience starts with strategy

Stay in the know with executive insights on digital resilience, delivered straight to your inbox.

Step 1: Phased Implementation — Courage to Start, Discipline to Scale

Getting started is often the hardest part. Big change can feel overwhelming, especially when tool sprawl is deeply rooted in how teams work. The key is to start small, move with purpose, and scale once you have real momentum.

 

The stakes are high, and rising. In 2023, 51% of financial institutions Start with a pilot. Pick one department where the pain of tool sprawl is obvious. It might be a specific IT engineering team, product team, or command center support; wherever multiple platforms are creating confusion, delays, or wasted spend. Keep the scope tight, but approach it with real intent. This is not a trial run; it is your first proof point. When a major global apparel brand tackled tool sprawl, they started with IT. Their Observability Engineering organization was given a target to reduce spend across observability by 20%. Through a structured approach-anchored in a comprehensive inventory and requirements scorecard-they were able to rationalize their tools, reducing the number of observability tools from over 40 to a core set of just 6. This consolidation resulted in a 30% decrease in overall spend, allowing the company to reinvest 10% of those savings to provide the right level of support and enablement for the organization. The lessons they learned in IT helped them scale these efficiencies more confidently across the entire enterprise capabilities like communication and collaboration tools, project and portfolio management, and more.

 

Plan the rollout around your business rhythms. Change hits harder when it collides with peak periods. Map your rollout phases to your business calendar, not just your project timelines. If the end of the quarter is a crunch time for sales, avoid layering big technology shifts on top of it. Look for windows when teams can absorb change without risking critical outcomes. Respecting the natural flow of the business isn’t just considerate — it dramatically improves your odds of success.


Invest early in change management. People resist what they don’t understand or feel forced to accept. Appoint champions inside each team who can lead the charge from within, not from the outside. Training should not be a single webinar or a dry manual. Use interactive sessions, creative engagement strategies, even gamified challenges if it fits your culture. Most important, communicate early, often, and without hiding the tough parts. Resistance is normal. How you respond to it will determine whether it slows you down or helps you build real buy-in.

 

 

Step 2: Migration and Integration

 

Consolidating tools looks clean on paper. The real work begins when you start moving data and stitching systems together. This is where good planning either holds up or starts to fall apart.

 

It’s tempting to trust the automated tools that promise seamless transfers. Some of them do a good job. But automation isn’t a substitute for vigilance. Data errors don’t just create technical headaches, they hit the business where it hurts most.

 

For critical systems, someone has to validate the results by hand. It’s tedious, but that’s the point. Without hands-on checks, minor mistakes snowball into major credibility problems.

 

Testing integrations isn’t a formality. It’s survival. When two systems talk to each other, they can either strengthen operations or cause silent breakdowns no one catches until the damage spreads. It’s not enough for systems to exchange data; they need to exchange the right data, at the right speed, without throwing off the business.

 

You can avoid these landmines by simulating real-world usage, not just running system checks in a clean lab environment. Order-to-fulfillment, customer sentiment, security audits — test the things that keep you awake at night. And if your teams are too close to spot the gaps, hire external testers who know where cracks usually form.

 

Migration and integration don’t care how solid your business case looked six months ago. At this stage, discipline matters more than vision. Rushing is the easiest way to turn a smart strategy into a public mess.

 

 

Step 3: Training and Support

 

Rolling out new tools is only half the battle. The real measure of success is whether people actually use them — and whether those tools make their work better, not harder.

 

Training has to fit the way people actually work. The fastest way to kill momentum is to push everyone through the same cookie-cutter training session. An engineer and a customer service rep don’t need the same depth, speed, or focus. And when training misses the mark, users either fall back on old habits or find messy workarounds.

 

The teams that get this right take the time to break training into tracks that are both generalized for foundational methodology education-such as Observability 101 courses-and targeted for specific personas like SREs, engineers, architects, and even business stakeholders, ensuring everyone understands the core principles and value of observability. By developing robust training plans to upskill and educate users on both the fundamental methodology and the tools themselves, the Observability team ensures there’s a concrete curriculum and clear policy in place before granting privileges. Hands-on workshops tend to stick better with tool training than passive webinars, however, self-paced trainings should be considered for introductory methodology training. In my previous role, we enabled this through our Center of Excellence which was the engine that enabled Observability across IT, establishing defined policies that required must-have training before users could access specific tools.

 

Training isn’t a “launch week” event, either. It has to continue as new features roll out or processes shift. Otherwise, old habits creep back in through the cracks.

 

Support makes or breaks the user experience. When problems pop up — and they will — your response time matters more than your rollout speech ever did. Early frustration spreads fast. If users feel abandoned when something breaks, they’ll assume the project was half-baked.

 

Set up a real support structure before go-live. Ticketing systems are good, but human touchpoints are better. Appoint go-to people in each department who can triage simple issues and escalate the tough ones. Regularly read the support logs yourself, not just the summaries to spot patterns before they snowball.

 

For example, if three different departments are logging similar complaints about the same integration, that's a flag that needs immediate attention, not a monthly review. Leaving problems to fester creates resentment, and resentment kills adoption faster than any technical failure ever could.

 

At this stage, you’re not just troubleshooting software. You’re defending the credibility of the entire initiative. And that’s not a job you can afford to phone in.

 

 

Monitoring Progress and Keeping It Real

 

Rolling out tool consolidation is one thing. Keeping it alive is another. Progress fades fast if you’re not paying attention to the right signals.

 

Forget vanity metrics. Focus on results that show real movement: how much money you're saving, how many redundant tools you've shut down, whether employees are actually using the new systems — and whether they're working the way they should. Set a monthly rhythm internally, then roll it up quarterly for executive sponsors. Charts and dashboards help, but what really matters is spotting trouble early and adjusting before things drift.

 

Formal feedback loops such as surveys, small focus groups, and even informal chats will tell you where cracks are forming. Sometimes, the real warning signs aren't complaints but silence or workarounds you didn’t expect. One healthcare organization found that users kept a banned legacy tool on personal devices after consolidation. It wasn’t sabotage; they just found the new tool harder to use. That small discovery saved them from a much bigger adoption failure.

 

Keeping feedback channels open and acting on what you hear is what separates a lasting change from a short-term win.

 

Making It Stick: Leadership and GuardrailsGovernance isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s what keeps you from sliding right back into chaos.

 

  • Executive Involvement: Stay visible. If leaders stop paying attention, so will everyone else.
  • Steering Committee: Bring business and IT voices together. One side without the other leads to bad decisions.
  • Center of Excellence: A small expert team can set standards and help teams get what they need without opening the floodgates.

Tool decisions should run through a standard review: clear business case, full cost analysis, tie to strategic goals. No shortcuts. Otherwise, you'll be back where you started in a year.

 

 

Tool rationalization isn’t something you finish and move on from. It’s an ongoing challenge. It requires leadership and a willingness to confront the hard truths. By the time you reach this final phase, the easy wins are long gone. What’s left are the tough choices that will either drive meaningful change or just keep things ticking along.

 

The companies that get this right won’t just clean up their operations; they’ll free up resources to innovate and stay ahead of competitors. The ones that don’t? They’ll be stuck with too many tools, too much wasted time, and missed opportunities.


Ready to make your tech stack work smarter, not harder? Subscribe to the Perspectives monthly newsletter for more on tool consolidation and strategies that actually move the needle.

Read more Perspectives by Splunk

APRIL 17, 2025  •  6 minute read

When to Choose GenAI, Agentic AI, or None of the Above

 

Not every use case calls for AI. Learn how to choose the right model, before it chooses for you.

APRIL 16, 2025  •  6 Minute Read

Elevating Observability with the Power of Platformization

 

Leaning into platformization can simplify observability and speed up insights, but it also comes with trade-offs every exec should weigh.

APRIL 2, 2025  •  7 minute read

Cyber Regulations Are a Goldmine — If You Use Them Right

 

Leverage regulations for a business edge.

Get more perspectives from security, IT and engineering leaders delivered straight to your inbox.