API Testing vs Monitoring: What's The Difference?

Learn Stephen Watts

We’ve already outlined why API performance matters and what aspects of APIs to test, but what is the difference between API testing and monitoring?

As with most things, context matters. The use cases for testing and monitoring are different because the objectives are different. The ultimate goal is to verify that your APIs are functioning properly, but staging environments vary significantly from production environments.

Why API Testing

Identifying a performance or functional problem in production is less than ideal. Testing should be integrated throughout the dev process because testing for code defects in pre-production helps minimize risk, thereby saving you time and money.

In pre-production, you want more flexibility because the use case of what you are trying to accomplish is different than it is in production. For instance, you don’t need to know if an API is stable and reliable. Rather, you need to know that you didn’t create a defect or slow down a workflow with a new update. Testing seeks to validate that performance and functionality haven’t been impacted by updates.

With API testing you want to:

The value of testing lies in identifying the deltas that occur once changes to the environment are introduced. As a result, tests should be run around these changes, but don’t need to be ongoing.

Why API Monitoring

Testing in pre-production, however, doesn’t negate the need to monitor production or live API performance on an ongoing basis. Performance monitoring verifies that APIs are functional, secure, and fast. This is especially critical to both identify and troubleshoot outages and errors in production environments that are often erratic.

API monitoring helps you do a few important things such as:

API Monitoring can help pinpoint failure

While API monitoring solutions could be used for testing, they aren’t fit for purpose. Pre-production environments are more controlled than production environments and failures likely won’t result in lost income. And, aspects of these products that are beneficial in production monitoring can actually be a hindrance in pre-production.

Testing and Monitoring Together

Both performance testing and monitoring are essential to approaching performance in a holistic way. You likely already leverage some form of functional testing, but if an aspect of your digital user experience–including your APIs–isn’t fast then we argue that they aren’t functional. For instance, if a critical API flow goes from taking half a second to complete to taking ten seconds, the API isn’t delivering a good user experience, even if it is technically functional. Finding that out in pre-production is ideal, so it can be addressed.

API testing and monitoring go hand-in-hand and comprise a comprehensive approach to delivering the best possible user experience. Performance testing seeks to increase the speed, transparency, and confidence by which you deliver user experiences. Monitoring helps ensure that those user experiences stay fast and reliable.

Related Articles

Observability That Works: Understand System Failures and Drive Better Business Outcomes
Learn
9 Minute Read

Observability That Works: Understand System Failures and Drive Better Business Outcomes

Observability gives teams end-to-end visibility into complex systems, helping them troubleshoot faster, improve user experiences, strengthen security, and gain critical business insights.
Software Testing: Complete Beginner's Guide
Learn
8 Minute Read

Software Testing: Complete Beginner's Guide

Discover the basics of software testing, its types, benefits, and best practices to ensure reliable, secure, and user-friendly applications.
What Is Syslog?
Learn
6 Minute Read

What Is Syslog?

Learn what Syslog is and how it can help you identify and troubleshoot problems as an IT professional.